2010 Nobel Prize in Literature Mario Vargas Losa, Promised this Sunday that he would address the President this Sunday Francisco Chagasti, The president did not “try to influence” Fursa to ask the popular presidential candidate. Keiko Fujimori, Accept the outcome of the second round of the 2021 general election.
View: Francisco Sagasti confirmed that Vargas had contacted Losa in an effort to maintain “peace and quiet.”
The novelist pointed out that the relationship with the head of state was “good” and functionalVery carefully“Avoid creating pressure on”Intermediaries“Who contacted the two presidential candidates last Wednesday, June 6, to call for peace after the election?”
“I have spoken with the President and I must tell him that the President is not trying to influence me, so I will ask Ms. Fujimori to accept the election result. He proposed that we should intervene with two candidates to pacify the current climate. I was in favor of Mrs. Fujimori, which is why I could not interfere with her enemy. The nature of this conversation was personal.”, He canal n.
“Immediately there was a good conversation and I was told that no one could comment on the exclusive powers of JNE, which is the company that will determine the winner. The president very wisely avoided putting pressure on intermediaries to act in any way. In a way I am violating by expressing a personal conversation“, He pointed out.
At another time, Vargas Losa considered the use of the word fraud “too dangerous” and said he believed the term “should not be used around the electoral process until JNE says so”.
“If the votes are real, genuine, at a good time, good, but if it is the result of manipulating the minutes, it will not matter. The only authority that can rule in this matter is the JNE. Until JNE completes its mission, it is not possible to talk about a winner in any way because it is necessary to see if there was fraud. While judging him, J.N.E.”, He declared.
“JNE should rule in this matter and not justify or justify the word fraud This is very dangerous because it involves manipulating to change the popular option, as JNE says, the word should not be usedHe added.
About Point Pedro Castillo
When asked about a government in charge Point Pedro Castillo, The author of ‘Conversation in the Cathedral’, stressed that the “catastrophe in the country” would be immeasurable and considered considering the presidential candidate Free Peru And General Secretary of the Committee Vladimir Serran to discuss economic issues. “It is scary”.
“If that candidate is president of the Republic, the catastrophe will no doubt be immeasurable. You may remember that the same thing happened in Venezuela in 1999 with the first elections that Hugo Chavez won fairly, but what did he do? He established a dictatorship that would expel millions of Venezuelan people with nothing to eat.He declared.
This may be of interest to you
“Internet addiction in terminals. Award-winning beer expert. Travel expert. General analyst.”
Six Essential Tips to Translate Your Work without Hassle
10 top tips for trading online
New automotive technologies